"Frontier Crucible" is now available to watch on
AMAZON PRIME VIDEO, APPLE TV, FANDANGO AT HOME, GOOGLE PLAY, and YOUTUBE
Movie synopsis:
A wagon carrying critically needed medical supplies is ambushed by Apache warriors. The only man capable of leading it safely to its destination is Merrick Beckford—but to make the journey, he must rely on three dangerous outlaws driven purely by survival. When they mistakenly kill an Apache scout, any chance of a clean escape disappears, and the mission turns into a brutal fight to stay alive in this tense western thriller from director Travis Mills.
Travis Mills was born in Quito, Ecuador, and spent much of his early life in Europe and Africa before settling in Arizona, where he co-founded Running Wild Films in 2010 with Gus Edwards. Together, they’ve produced over 25 feature films and 100 short projects.
In 2020, Mills completed an ambitious slate of 12 Westerns in 12 months, later chronicled in his book The Making of 12 Westerns. He collaborated with Dallas Sonnier on Terror on the Prairie and The Pendragon Cycle, and in 2024 saw his screenplay Thieves Highway produced while also directing the Western Frontier Crucible, starring William H. Macy, Armie Hammer, and Thomas Jane.
Here is the Novelpro junkie interview with Mr. Travis Mills:
A wagon carrying critically needed medical supplies is ambushed by Apache warriors. The only man capable of leading it safely to its destination is Merrick Beckford—but to make the journey, he must rely on three dangerous outlaws driven purely by survival. When they mistakenly kill an Apache scout, any chance of a clean escape disappears, and the mission turns into a brutal fight to stay alive in this tense western thriller from director Travis Mills.
Travis Mills was born in Quito, Ecuador, and spent much of his early life in Europe and Africa before settling in Arizona, where he co-founded Running Wild Films in 2010 with Gus Edwards. Together, they’ve produced over 25 feature films and 100 short projects.
In 2020, Mills completed an ambitious slate of 12 Westerns in 12 months, later chronicled in his book The Making of 12 Westerns. He collaborated with Dallas Sonnier on Terror on the Prairie and The Pendragon Cycle, and in 2024 saw his screenplay Thieves Highway produced while also directing the Western Frontier Crucible, starring William H. Macy, Armie Hammer, and Thomas Jane.
Here is the Novelpro junkie interview with Mr. Travis Mills:
1. Frontier Crucible is based on Harry Whittington ’s novel "Desert Stake-Out". What drew you to this story, and what inspired you to adapt it for the screen?
Yeah, I was unfamiliar with the novel until producer Dallas Sonnier—who did Bone Tomahawk and Brawl in Cell Block 99, two movies I’m a huge fan of—approached me about the script. I had made a bunch of Westerns in 2020, and he and I started talking. He said he was trying to get this Western off the ground called Frontier Crucible, which was based on the Harry Whittington novel.
He sent me the screenplay, and after reading it, I went back and read the novel. They’re very, very close—the screenplay is basically the novel with some slight changes. That’s when I first heard about it. I had actually never heard of Harry Whittington before. I’m a fan of pulp novels—crime and Western—but I’m not an aficionado. I think his writing is really great. I’ve only read this one, but he’s obviously a very talented writer from that era.
2. Why did you decided to call the film “Frontier Crucible” and not the novel’s title?
I think because Desert Stake-out, the stake-out of the title is not something a modern audience really understands. They're talking about staking people out to the ground. But when you hear Desert Stake-out, you think about Richard Dreyfuss and Emilio Estevez stake-out, like a police stake-out. And so we didn't want to go with the original title. I thought it would be misleading. And they came up with Frontier Crucible before I was involved.
I think it’s because Desert Stake-out—the “stake-out” in the title—isn’t something a modern audience really understands. It refers to staking someone to the ground, but when you hear Desert Stake-out, you think of a police stake-out, like the one with Richard Dreyfuss and Emilio Estevez. So, we didn’t want to use the original title, since it felt misleading. Frontier Crucible was actually chosen before I got involved.
3. The story is set in 1870s Arizona Territory. What research or preparation went into accurately depicting that time and place?
Yeah, I’ve made a bunch of Westerns in Arizona, so I already had that foundation to help me stay accurate. But I think, to make a historically accurate movie, the key is surrounding yourself with people who know what they’re talking about. I work with a guy named John Mars who knows all about the costumes, weapons, and saddles from that era. He read extensively and has been passionate about it for years.
When it came to portraying the Apaches, we relied on a couple of the Apache actors in the film to tell us whether the clothing and face paint were accurate. I’m not a historical expert myself—I don’t have the time to be—so I depend on others with that expertise.
4. The central plot involves a wagon carrying medical supplies attacked by Apaches. How did you approach balancing historical accuracy with narrative tension?
Yeah, I think we followed the fantastic narrative of the novel, which is such a great setup for a movie—especially a single-location film. I’ve made all kinds of films, and I know it’s very hard to move from location to location during production, especially with a cast of 20 or more. This film had a smaller cast and a tight, almost potboiler-style plot that worked perfectly, so I didn’t have to change much.
I was given an incredible screenplay based on an incredible novel, and my job was really to guide the performances and bring it to life visually. Thankfully, after many years of searching, we found a fantastic location. The “waterhole” is actually a lake in Prescott, Arizona, with coves that we were able to make look like a desert waterhole.
That was always the look I had in mind. I took a lot of inspiration from the 1950s films Budd Boetticher made with Randolph Scott—I wanted that rugged desert feel, and I was thrilled we were able to find it in Prescott.
5. What was the biggest challenge of directing a Western-thriller, particularly with large-scale action sequences like the wagon attack?
I think the biggest challenge was that we filmed the entire movie in 18 days. I've filmed movies in a shorter time but not with this long of a script. The script was over 120 pages so there was just a lot of content to capture in those 18 days and some of the sequences you we really needed more time. For instance, the crucible at the end, there's lots of, you know, very specific gags, so to speak, that I won't spoil for anyone. But if you see the movie, there's some very specific things that required special effects, special effects makeup. Those things take time. So packing all that into 18 days while retaining the story, retaining the performances, making sure it's all there, making sure that it's all good. was very challenging.
I think the biggest challenge was that we filmed the entire movie in 18 days. I’ve worked on films with even shorter schedules, but not with a script this long. It was over 120 pages, so there was a lot of material to capture in that time, and some sequences really needed more breathing room.
For example, the crucible at the end involves a number of very specific moments—without giving anything away—that required special effects and makeup, which take time. Fitting all of that into 18 days while preserving the story, maintaining strong performances, and ensuring everything came together well was definitely a challenge.
6. Were there any scenes or sequences that were particularly difficult to shoot, emotionally?
I was blessed with an incredible cast who were passionate about the project and their characters. I didn’t have to get them “into the zone,” so to speak; I just guided them and gave notes to help hit the right beats.
I never had to work with anyone who didn’t feel fully present in the moment. I was really fortunate—actors like Thomas Jane, with his connection to his son in the film, and the two leads, Myles and Mary, whose chemistry was very natural. It was already there; I didn’t have to create or force it, which is an ideal situation for a director.
7. The cast includes Myles Clohessy, Thomas Jane, and Armie Hammer. What qualities did you see in them that made them right for their roles?
I think they’re all very different. Myles Clohessy is definitely a leading man—naturally effective on screen and able to carry the film in a quiet way. With him, the biggest thing was reminding him to trust himself and not push the performance. He just needed to be confident and subtle, without forcing an accent or trying too hard to emote—very much in the style of Randolph Scott or Clint Eastwood.
Thomas Jane is incredibly creative, full of ideas, and always eager to contribute to the scene. Sometimes we’d clash over those ideas, but we always found a good compromise. Often, his suggestions would blend with mine to create something really special on screen.
And Armie was an absolute pleasure to work with. He was excited to be there, willing to try anything, very creative, and adaptable—completely moldable to whatever direction I wanted to take the scene.
8. Were there any ad lib moments on set that ended up making it into the final film?
I think the mission was really to shoot the script as written and not rely heavily on improvisation, because the dialogue was so special. Most of the ad-lib moments were nonverbal—physical delivery rather than words. For instance, when Thomas Jane tries to surprise Myles and sneak up behind him, the way he moves away afterward in a very specific manner was never scripted. That was him adding in the moment.
Another great moment is after his son is killed in the movie, when he combs his son’s hair with the comb, we’ve seen his son use multiple times. That was something I came up with and suggested to Thomas. These little touches weren’t scripted, but in terms of the dialogue, we really stuck to the words on the page.
9. How do you think the film speaks to modern audiences, even though it’s set in the 19th century?
I think period pieces often speak more to the present day than contemporary movies, because they allow you to reflect on the present through the lens of the past—and it’s easier to learn from it. This one specifically—I’m not going to psychoanalyze my own work—but I think the main theme of this movie is sticking to your principles, no matter what comes your way.
Myles’s character, Merrick Beckford, has agreed to deliver medical supplies to San Carlos, and nothing will stop him simply because he made a promise and he’s a man of principle. He faces death, the temptations of a woman, torture, and the offer of money, yet none of these deter him from his path. That adherence to principle has been a hallmark of the Western genre, both in print and on screen, though it’s often lost in modern Westerns. This film brings it back, and I think that’s part of what draws people in.
It’s an important message for today’s culture: sticking to your principles is honorable. Having dignity and honor are values that, in many ways, have been lost in our society.
10. Are there any directors or films that influenced your approach to this movie?
The biggest ones would definitely be Bud Bedeker and Randolph Scott's Westerns from the 50s, specifically The Tall T. which I think is the best Western ever made, also Ride Lonesome, Sam Peckinpah's Ride the High Country, also his movie, Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, specifically the way that the lyrical songs by Bob Dylan are used in that movie influenced the way that we had Sean Rowe write the soundtrack for this one.
The biggest influences would definitely be Budd Boetticher and Randolph Scott’s Westerns from the ’50s, specifically “The Tall T”, which I think is the best Western ever made, as well as “Ride Lonesome”. Sam Peckinpah’s “Ride the High Country” and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid were also major influences—particularly the way the lyrical songs by Bob Dylan are used in Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, which inspired how we had Sean Rowe compose the soundtrack for this film.
11. You did a project back in 2013, where you shot 52 short films in 52 weeks, they were based on short stories by authors such as Edgar Allen Poe, James Joyce, etc. Which of those short films would you have liked to make into a feature film?
I think that’s difficult because shorts and features are so different. I tried to adapt James Joyce’s The Dead—probably one of the best short stories ever written—into a short film. Of course, John Huston made it into a feature film in the 1980s. That story could definitely work as a feature, and I think it would be really interesting.
The Poe shorts, on the other hand, are better suited to the short form on screen. It’s hard to stretch them into a feature unless you combine several of them, which I’ve considered. But, The Dead would be the main one still worth adapting, though doing justice to Joyce is very difficult.
12. You have ever met your admirer from the business and how was the experience?
Dallas Sonnier is someone I’d admired for many years before we worked together. We’ve made several films now, and I still sit back and think, “Wow, this is such an amazing opportunity—to work with a producer who’s made films I truly love.” On Frontier Crucible, we collaborated as director and producer, which has been incredible.
I’m a little nervous about meeting some of my other heroes in film, like Werner Herzog or my favorite actor, Nicolas Cage, because there’s always a chance you might be disappointed. In some ways, I think keeping the mystery is better.
13. Did you make a cameo in this film?
No, I did not make a cameo in Frontier Crucible. I usually do small cameos in my films, and I considered playing the character at the beginning who gets killed—Beckford’s brother—but ultimately, I didn’t appear in the movie.
14. What do you currently do as a hobby?
I really don’t have time in my life for hobbies. I pretty much just make movies, and in the small amount of free time I have, I read, watch films, and go on walks with my girlfriend when we’re able to see each other. I live a very simple life, but I don’t have time to take up a hobby because my entire life is committed to making movies.
15. You were born in Ecuador and had lived in Europe and Africa, before staying in the states, could you mention one fun fact about each continent that comes mind when you think of your experience in those places?
Sadly, I don’t really remember Ecuador because I left when I was two years old. My parents were missionaries, which is why I was born there. Afterward, we moved to Europe so they could learn French, preparing to live in Africa in a place called the Comoro Islands.
The Comoro Islands are very vivid in my memory and were highly influential in my upbringing, growing up in a third-world country. In some ways, I think this upbringing shaped my perspective, making my thinking different from peers who were raised in America as a result of my experiences as a missionary kid.
One fun fact from my time in the Comoro Islands is that I was bitten by a mongoose lemur when I was ten, leaving a large scar on my right arm—something that always makes for a fun story.
Yeah, I was unfamiliar with the novel until producer Dallas Sonnier—who did Bone Tomahawk and Brawl in Cell Block 99, two movies I’m a huge fan of—approached me about the script. I had made a bunch of Westerns in 2020, and he and I started talking. He said he was trying to get this Western off the ground called Frontier Crucible, which was based on the Harry Whittington novel.
He sent me the screenplay, and after reading it, I went back and read the novel. They’re very, very close—the screenplay is basically the novel with some slight changes. That’s when I first heard about it. I had actually never heard of Harry Whittington before. I’m a fan of pulp novels—crime and Western—but I’m not an aficionado. I think his writing is really great. I’ve only read this one, but he’s obviously a very talented writer from that era.
2. Why did you decided to call the film “Frontier Crucible” and not the novel’s title?
I think because Desert Stake-out, the stake-out of the title is not something a modern audience really understands. They're talking about staking people out to the ground. But when you hear Desert Stake-out, you think about Richard Dreyfuss and Emilio Estevez stake-out, like a police stake-out. And so we didn't want to go with the original title. I thought it would be misleading. And they came up with Frontier Crucible before I was involved.
I think it’s because Desert Stake-out—the “stake-out” in the title—isn’t something a modern audience really understands. It refers to staking someone to the ground, but when you hear Desert Stake-out, you think of a police stake-out, like the one with Richard Dreyfuss and Emilio Estevez. So, we didn’t want to use the original title, since it felt misleading. Frontier Crucible was actually chosen before I got involved.
3. The story is set in 1870s Arizona Territory. What research or preparation went into accurately depicting that time and place?
Yeah, I’ve made a bunch of Westerns in Arizona, so I already had that foundation to help me stay accurate. But I think, to make a historically accurate movie, the key is surrounding yourself with people who know what they’re talking about. I work with a guy named John Mars who knows all about the costumes, weapons, and saddles from that era. He read extensively and has been passionate about it for years.
When it came to portraying the Apaches, we relied on a couple of the Apache actors in the film to tell us whether the clothing and face paint were accurate. I’m not a historical expert myself—I don’t have the time to be—so I depend on others with that expertise.
4. The central plot involves a wagon carrying medical supplies attacked by Apaches. How did you approach balancing historical accuracy with narrative tension?
Yeah, I think we followed the fantastic narrative of the novel, which is such a great setup for a movie—especially a single-location film. I’ve made all kinds of films, and I know it’s very hard to move from location to location during production, especially with a cast of 20 or more. This film had a smaller cast and a tight, almost potboiler-style plot that worked perfectly, so I didn’t have to change much.
I was given an incredible screenplay based on an incredible novel, and my job was really to guide the performances and bring it to life visually. Thankfully, after many years of searching, we found a fantastic location. The “waterhole” is actually a lake in Prescott, Arizona, with coves that we were able to make look like a desert waterhole.
That was always the look I had in mind. I took a lot of inspiration from the 1950s films Budd Boetticher made with Randolph Scott—I wanted that rugged desert feel, and I was thrilled we were able to find it in Prescott.
5. What was the biggest challenge of directing a Western-thriller, particularly with large-scale action sequences like the wagon attack?
I think the biggest challenge was that we filmed the entire movie in 18 days. I've filmed movies in a shorter time but not with this long of a script. The script was over 120 pages so there was just a lot of content to capture in those 18 days and some of the sequences you we really needed more time. For instance, the crucible at the end, there's lots of, you know, very specific gags, so to speak, that I won't spoil for anyone. But if you see the movie, there's some very specific things that required special effects, special effects makeup. Those things take time. So packing all that into 18 days while retaining the story, retaining the performances, making sure it's all there, making sure that it's all good. was very challenging.
I think the biggest challenge was that we filmed the entire movie in 18 days. I’ve worked on films with even shorter schedules, but not with a script this long. It was over 120 pages, so there was a lot of material to capture in that time, and some sequences really needed more breathing room.
For example, the crucible at the end involves a number of very specific moments—without giving anything away—that required special effects and makeup, which take time. Fitting all of that into 18 days while preserving the story, maintaining strong performances, and ensuring everything came together well was definitely a challenge.
6. Were there any scenes or sequences that were particularly difficult to shoot, emotionally?
I was blessed with an incredible cast who were passionate about the project and their characters. I didn’t have to get them “into the zone,” so to speak; I just guided them and gave notes to help hit the right beats.
I never had to work with anyone who didn’t feel fully present in the moment. I was really fortunate—actors like Thomas Jane, with his connection to his son in the film, and the two leads, Myles and Mary, whose chemistry was very natural. It was already there; I didn’t have to create or force it, which is an ideal situation for a director.
7. The cast includes Myles Clohessy, Thomas Jane, and Armie Hammer. What qualities did you see in them that made them right for their roles?
I think they’re all very different. Myles Clohessy is definitely a leading man—naturally effective on screen and able to carry the film in a quiet way. With him, the biggest thing was reminding him to trust himself and not push the performance. He just needed to be confident and subtle, without forcing an accent or trying too hard to emote—very much in the style of Randolph Scott or Clint Eastwood.
Thomas Jane is incredibly creative, full of ideas, and always eager to contribute to the scene. Sometimes we’d clash over those ideas, but we always found a good compromise. Often, his suggestions would blend with mine to create something really special on screen.
And Armie was an absolute pleasure to work with. He was excited to be there, willing to try anything, very creative, and adaptable—completely moldable to whatever direction I wanted to take the scene.
8. Were there any ad lib moments on set that ended up making it into the final film?
I think the mission was really to shoot the script as written and not rely heavily on improvisation, because the dialogue was so special. Most of the ad-lib moments were nonverbal—physical delivery rather than words. For instance, when Thomas Jane tries to surprise Myles and sneak up behind him, the way he moves away afterward in a very specific manner was never scripted. That was him adding in the moment.
Another great moment is after his son is killed in the movie, when he combs his son’s hair with the comb, we’ve seen his son use multiple times. That was something I came up with and suggested to Thomas. These little touches weren’t scripted, but in terms of the dialogue, we really stuck to the words on the page.
9. How do you think the film speaks to modern audiences, even though it’s set in the 19th century?
I think period pieces often speak more to the present day than contemporary movies, because they allow you to reflect on the present through the lens of the past—and it’s easier to learn from it. This one specifically—I’m not going to psychoanalyze my own work—but I think the main theme of this movie is sticking to your principles, no matter what comes your way.
Myles’s character, Merrick Beckford, has agreed to deliver medical supplies to San Carlos, and nothing will stop him simply because he made a promise and he’s a man of principle. He faces death, the temptations of a woman, torture, and the offer of money, yet none of these deter him from his path. That adherence to principle has been a hallmark of the Western genre, both in print and on screen, though it’s often lost in modern Westerns. This film brings it back, and I think that’s part of what draws people in.
It’s an important message for today’s culture: sticking to your principles is honorable. Having dignity and honor are values that, in many ways, have been lost in our society.
10. Are there any directors or films that influenced your approach to this movie?
The biggest ones would definitely be Bud Bedeker and Randolph Scott's Westerns from the 50s, specifically The Tall T. which I think is the best Western ever made, also Ride Lonesome, Sam Peckinpah's Ride the High Country, also his movie, Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, specifically the way that the lyrical songs by Bob Dylan are used in that movie influenced the way that we had Sean Rowe write the soundtrack for this one.
The biggest influences would definitely be Budd Boetticher and Randolph Scott’s Westerns from the ’50s, specifically “The Tall T”, which I think is the best Western ever made, as well as “Ride Lonesome”. Sam Peckinpah’s “Ride the High Country” and Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid were also major influences—particularly the way the lyrical songs by Bob Dylan are used in Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, which inspired how we had Sean Rowe compose the soundtrack for this film.
11. You did a project back in 2013, where you shot 52 short films in 52 weeks, they were based on short stories by authors such as Edgar Allen Poe, James Joyce, etc. Which of those short films would you have liked to make into a feature film?
I think that’s difficult because shorts and features are so different. I tried to adapt James Joyce’s The Dead—probably one of the best short stories ever written—into a short film. Of course, John Huston made it into a feature film in the 1980s. That story could definitely work as a feature, and I think it would be really interesting.
The Poe shorts, on the other hand, are better suited to the short form on screen. It’s hard to stretch them into a feature unless you combine several of them, which I’ve considered. But, The Dead would be the main one still worth adapting, though doing justice to Joyce is very difficult.
12. You have ever met your admirer from the business and how was the experience?
Dallas Sonnier is someone I’d admired for many years before we worked together. We’ve made several films now, and I still sit back and think, “Wow, this is such an amazing opportunity—to work with a producer who’s made films I truly love.” On Frontier Crucible, we collaborated as director and producer, which has been incredible.
I’m a little nervous about meeting some of my other heroes in film, like Werner Herzog or my favorite actor, Nicolas Cage, because there’s always a chance you might be disappointed. In some ways, I think keeping the mystery is better.
13. Did you make a cameo in this film?
No, I did not make a cameo in Frontier Crucible. I usually do small cameos in my films, and I considered playing the character at the beginning who gets killed—Beckford’s brother—but ultimately, I didn’t appear in the movie.
14. What do you currently do as a hobby?
I really don’t have time in my life for hobbies. I pretty much just make movies, and in the small amount of free time I have, I read, watch films, and go on walks with my girlfriend when we’re able to see each other. I live a very simple life, but I don’t have time to take up a hobby because my entire life is committed to making movies.
15. You were born in Ecuador and had lived in Europe and Africa, before staying in the states, could you mention one fun fact about each continent that comes mind when you think of your experience in those places?
Sadly, I don’t really remember Ecuador because I left when I was two years old. My parents were missionaries, which is why I was born there. Afterward, we moved to Europe so they could learn French, preparing to live in Africa in a place called the Comoro Islands.
The Comoro Islands are very vivid in my memory and were highly influential in my upbringing, growing up in a third-world country. In some ways, I think this upbringing shaped my perspective, making my thinking different from peers who were raised in America as a result of my experiences as a missionary kid.
One fun fact from my time in the Comoro Islands is that I was bitten by a mongoose lemur when I was ten, leaving a large scar on my right arm—something that always makes for a fun story.
RSS Feed
